top of page
Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 12.02.00 PM.png

The Curse of Ham: Biblical Justification for Racial Inequality?

Charles David Isbell

Vol. 2, No. 2

Fall 2020

Pages: 1-11

DOI: 10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no2.01

ORCID_logo_with_tagline.svg.png
dimensions_logo_400x80.png

More from the Author

Abstract

Editorial

Curse of Ham, Noah, Nakedness, Drunkenness, Incest, Charles David Isbell

Rational Faith.png
Rational Faith.png

The story of the drunkenness of Noah that caused him to remove his clothing and thus provided the opportunity for his son, Ham, to “see” him (Genesis 9:20‒27), has never received an interpretation that has been unanimously adopted by interpreters over the centuries. By examining the concept of “nakedness” as it functions in biblical legislation, this article argues that the most plausible understanding of the passage is that Ham committed incest with the wife of his father, Noah. Concomitantly, it becomes clear that the literalist idea of “race” used to undergird either slavery or any comparable form of white supremacy cannot be derived exegetically from the passage.

Preview

Davis, Stephen vol 2, no 2 PREVIEW_Page_
$1.99

$1.99

Print Issue

$20.25

SHERM Front Cover - no glow.png
crossref-members.png
Proquest Ebsco Logo.png
ORCID_Cert_Service_Provider_logo[&vF].pn
ATLA 3.jpg
Graphic Advertisement 1 (oval).png
bottom of page